|
June 6th, 2008
Making Sense of Match TypesLearn how to make your ads more relevant Sometimes my socks don’t match. This is not a fashion statement but usually the result of my hectic morning rush to get out the door and to work. You may always be lucky and conscious of wearing matching socks (which I’m slightly jealous of), but you may have some questions about using match types with your Yahoo! Search Marketing campaign. That’s where we can help you. First, you need to know that Sponsored Search offers two different “match types” that help you control the way in which your keywords are matched to the terms web users enter into search boxes: Standard and Advanced. The Advanced Match Type The benefit of the Advanced match type is that it will display your ad for related searches using keywords that you may not have specifically added to your campaigns. It can also save you time and remove the burden of having to think of every possible keyword related to your products or services. However, while the Advanced match type can deliver more traffic, this traffic could potentially be less relevant. Example: The keyword “Fender guitar” could be matched to related search terms such as “Fender Telecaster guitar,” “Fender Stratocaster guitar” and “electric Fender guitar.” When using the Advanced match type, make sure to use excluded words as needed. Excluded words specify search terms that you don’t want to be matched to through the Advanced match type. Here are a few key details about excluded words: The Standard Match Type Example: “Fender guitar” could match to “Fender guitars” and “Fender’s guitars.” You can control your match types from the account level, all the way down to individual keywords. Learn more about them at our help center. But sadly, the help center says nothing about socks. — Roger Park, Manager, Marketing Communications Manager and occasional non-matching sock wearer |
|
3 Comments Add your own
1. woozor | June 8th, 2008 at 2:01 pm
it is a really good thing for us, advertisers… Thanks
2. acai | June 17th, 2008 at 8:39 am
Not too good – by filtering out so many ‘duplicates’ during keyword list making it takes away from too many choices when targeting tightly during standard match use.
3. Bill | June 17th, 2008 at 2:48 pm
I find it better to use different (more)”exact phrase” words. The search engines will always give you more than you want. That way you can start with a narrow search, and expand from there.
Leave a Comment
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed