<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Updates Great and Small</title>
	<link>http://www.ysmblog.com/blog/2007/10/08/updates-great-and-small/</link>
	<description>The official blog of Yahoo! Search MArketing</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 13:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eating Around</title>
		<link>http://www.ysmblog.com/blog/2007/10/08/updates-great-and-small/#comment-64560</link>
		<dc:creator>Eating Around</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 09:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ysmblog.com/blog/2007/10/08/updates-great-and-small/#comment-64560</guid>
		<description>Could you please add import adgroups or campaign to my account?
This will save much time.

Thanks
YSM Advertizer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could you please add import adgroups or campaign to my account?<br />
This will save much time.</p>
<p>Thanks<br />
YSM Advertizer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: This Week In SEO - 10/12/07 - TheVanBlog</title>
		<link>http://www.ysmblog.com/blog/2007/10/08/updates-great-and-small/#comment-64304</link>
		<dc:creator>This Week In SEO - 10/12/07 - TheVanBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 02:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ysmblog.com/blog/2007/10/08/updates-great-and-small/#comment-64304</guid>
		<description>[...] Updates Great and Small [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Updates Great and Small [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HELM, WHM/cPanel, Windows, Linux and SEO Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Yahoo Upgrades Advertisers Console, Which Causes Some Bugs</title>
		<link>http://www.ysmblog.com/blog/2007/10/08/updates-great-and-small/#comment-63486</link>
		<dc:creator>HELM, WHM/cPanel, Windows, Linux and SEO Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Yahoo Upgrades Advertisers Console, Which Causes Some Bugs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 01:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ysmblog.com/blog/2007/10/08/updates-great-and-small/#comment-63486</guid>
		<description>[...] Yahoo Search Marketing Blog announced that they have made several updates to their advertisers console. The changes include more custom [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Yahoo Search Marketing Blog announced that they have made several updates to their advertisers console. The changes include more custom [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.ysmblog.com/blog/2007/10/08/updates-great-and-small/#comment-63359</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 21:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ysmblog.com/blog/2007/10/08/updates-great-and-small/#comment-63359</guid>
		<description>The "Next" and "Previous" buttons are a big improvement, but Jeff has it right.  Adwords Editor blows this browser-control out of the water.  Next and Previous help with small campaigns, but what about when you have thousands to look up?

If you don't want to create a program that we can download and use, why not put a Windows-Explorer-type list of Ad Groups and Keywords down the side of the page so we can click through our keywords quickly.  Anything that helps speed up the process of sorting through thousands of keywords would help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;Next&#8221; and &#8220;Previous&#8221; buttons are a big improvement, but Jeff has it right.  Adwords Editor blows this browser-control out of the water.  Next and Previous help with small campaigns, but what about when you have thousands to look up?</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t want to create a program that we can download and use, why not put a Windows-Explorer-type list of Ad Groups and Keywords down the side of the page so we can click through our keywords quickly.  Anything that helps speed up the process of sorting through thousands of keywords would help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.ysmblog.com/blog/2007/10/08/updates-great-and-small/#comment-63140</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 11:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ysmblog.com/blog/2007/10/08/updates-great-and-small/#comment-63140</guid>
		<description>adwords editor

Make it yesterday

Thx

Jeff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>adwords editor</p>
<p>Make it yesterday</p>
<p>Thx</p>
<p>Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.ysmblog.com/blog/2007/10/08/updates-great-and-small/#comment-62768</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 20:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ysmblog.com/blog/2007/10/08/updates-great-and-small/#comment-62768</guid>
		<description>Instead of saying 'coming soon' regarding the control of where clicks are coming from why doesn't Yahoo! use discretion and wait until the product is ready. After all this should have always been allowed. It seems as if Yahoo! is always purporting a we don't care if you use us or don't philosophy. It just seems rather audacious to state that you are fixing something that never should have been broken in the first place. And I agree, why should we as advertisers have to prove click fraud through our weblogs when your information substantiates all claims? How many times has someone 'looked the other way' when noticing fraudulent traffic? It's great your fixing it, but please lose some of the arrogance that comes along with your announcement. Many marketers share the same opinion. You have a valuable product, but the way the company has sluffed off on the responsibilites it owes its advertisers has been disgraceful at best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Instead of saying &#8216;coming soon&#8217; regarding the control of where clicks are coming from why doesn&#8217;t Yahoo! use discretion and wait until the product is ready. After all this should have always been allowed. It seems as if Yahoo! is always purporting a we don&#8217;t care if you use us or don&#8217;t philosophy. It just seems rather audacious to state that you are fixing something that never should have been broken in the first place. And I agree, why should we as advertisers have to prove click fraud through our weblogs when your information substantiates all claims? How many times has someone &#8216;looked the other way&#8217; when noticing fraudulent traffic? It&#8217;s great your fixing it, but please lose some of the arrogance that comes along with your announcement. Many marketers share the same opinion. You have a valuable product, but the way the company has sluffed off on the responsibilites it owes its advertisers has been disgraceful at best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Dog Clothing &#38; Dog Costume Company</title>
		<link>http://www.ysmblog.com/blog/2007/10/08/updates-great-and-small/#comment-62708</link>
		<dc:creator>The Dog Clothing &#38; Dog Costume Company</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 19:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ysmblog.com/blog/2007/10/08/updates-great-and-small/#comment-62708</guid>
		<description>These are very good improvements. Personally I especially like the "Custom Reports and Scheduling". Thanks guy and keep up the good work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are very good improvements. Personally I especially like the &#8220;Custom Reports and Scheduling&#8221;. Thanks guy and keep up the good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isabel Fernandez</title>
		<link>http://www.ysmblog.com/blog/2007/10/08/updates-great-and-small/#comment-62589</link>
		<dc:creator>Isabel Fernandez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 14:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ysmblog.com/blog/2007/10/08/updates-great-and-small/#comment-62589</guid>
		<description>Regarding unwanted clicks received through Yahoo partner sites, I think I have found a way through my website stats to spot Yahoo partners. The keywords that receive clicks from Yahoo show the link that I set up with a YH code, the clicks I receive from partner sites come with a OV code that I never set up.
I hope it helps you spot sites that send you unwanted traffic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding unwanted clicks received through Yahoo partner sites, I think I have found a way through my website stats to spot Yahoo partners. The keywords that receive clicks from Yahoo show the link that I set up with a YH code, the clicks I receive from partner sites come with a OV code that I never set up.<br />
I hope it helps you spot sites that send you unwanted traffic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yahoo Advertiser</title>
		<link>http://www.ysmblog.com/blog/2007/10/08/updates-great-and-small/#comment-62556</link>
		<dc:creator>Yahoo Advertiser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 12:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ysmblog.com/blog/2007/10/08/updates-great-and-small/#comment-62556</guid>
		<description>How absurb is it for Yahoo Customer reps to ask its own customers to check their own server logs for origin of clicks and initiate the block after Yahoo has charged us already?

Not providing a block list or limitation on advertising only on Yahoo search engine gives me an impression that majority of clicks come from "questionable" ad partners and by providing these "conveniences" to its own customers will result in a huge plunge in advertising revenue for Yahoo. Lets face it, all this time, it is like pulling teeth with Yahoo. You guys have dragged your feet but don't you realize customers have other options. A far better option in Google. 

Please get your act together before its too late!

Frustrated Yahoo Advertiser</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How absurb is it for Yahoo Customer reps to ask its own customers to check their own server logs for origin of clicks and initiate the block after Yahoo has charged us already?</p>
<p>Not providing a block list or limitation on advertising only on Yahoo search engine gives me an impression that majority of clicks come from &#8220;questionable&#8221; ad partners and by providing these &#8220;conveniences&#8221; to its own customers will result in a huge plunge in advertising revenue for Yahoo. Lets face it, all this time, it is like pulling teeth with Yahoo. You guys have dragged your feet but don&#8217;t you realize customers have other options. A far better option in Google. </p>
<p>Please get your act together before its too late!</p>
<p>Frustrated Yahoo Advertiser</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Yahoo Search Marketing Features &#124; loan &#124; Just another WordPress weblog</title>
		<link>http://www.ysmblog.com/blog/2007/10/08/updates-great-and-small/#comment-62448</link>
		<dc:creator>New Yahoo Search Marketing Features &#124; loan &#124; Just another WordPress weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 07:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ysmblog.com/blog/2007/10/08/updates-great-and-small/#comment-62448</guid>
		<description>[...] Following last week&#8217;s announcement of how Google finally has a real challenge, the official Yahoo! Search Marketing Blog announced updates for YSM. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Following last week&#8217;s announcement of how Google finally has a real challenge, the official Yahoo! Search Marketing Blog announced updates for YSM. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
