|
February 21st, 2007
Improving Ad Quality, Part IVStructure Matters By now you’ve started to see how your campaigns work with the new ranking model, and hopefully you’re seeing some positive results. We’ve previously talked about ways to help improve your ads so that they perform better under the new ranking model–using the Insert Keyword feature and Ad Testing are two examples. How you structure your account can impact your ads’ performance. For example, you may want different campaigns for your brand keywords and your product keywords because you may want to track budgets separately. Or you may want to set up campaigns for specific geographies using geo-targeting or holiday campaigns using the scheduling feature. (Note that most accounts are limited to 20 campaigns.) In general, the structure of your ad groups can help improve the relevance? of your ads to the search terms for which they may be displayed. There are a number of ways to do this, but here are three things that you may want to consider: Categorize
Isolate and Protect Value In general, you may find that roughly 10 percent of your keywords account for 90 percent of the value you’re measuring. It’s a classic rule of thumb in the search world. This isn’t to say that the other 90 percent of keywords are useless, just that those 10 percent are probably super important. Protect this extraordinary value and isolate these keywords into their own ad groups. This way you can take total control of the messages you are communicating to these searchers. You can test ads specifically for these keywords, not muddy the waters in any way, and could see improvements in your ad quality. Think of the Customer Experience
If you want to get really sophisticated with your account structure, you can start to take advantage of this “buying cycle.” Group your keywords (still by category) into ad groups that are associated with where customers are in their decision-making processes. In general, keywords with more impressions are more geared toward “attention,” whereas more specific keywords are closer to the purchase action. Once you set this up, you can then alter the creative in your ads to focus on bringing them down the path for your particular product. Remember, structure does matter. How you link your ads with your keywords may have a significant impact on their overall performance and ultimately, with our new system, the economics of your account. View previous posts in this series: —Michael Egan, Senior Director, Content Solutions |
|
11 Comments Add your own
1. Richard Ball | February 22nd, 2007 at 7:01 am
I’m more concerned with the quality of ad distribution. Tracking recent Y!SM PPC clicks, I’m seeing a high percentage of traffic from low quality sites. I need to know how to either block individual sites or how to configure a campaign (or entire account) to only run ads on Y! properties. I haven’t found either in the documentation for the new Y!SM. Could you please let me know how to:
1) Block ad distribution to individual sites
2) Run ads only on search.yahoo.com
Thanks.
2. Administrator | February 23rd, 2007 at 11:47 am
Dear Richard,
Sorry, but we don’t draw a distinction between traffic from our thousands of publisher sources, nor do we allow advertisers to opt-out of particular partner implementations. When advertisers bid on a particular keyword, the bid covers clicks from all sources. Also, since advertisers themselves control their bids, the price paid per click reflects the aggregate value of that traffic.
-M2
3. Richard Ball | February 26th, 2007 at 5:13 pm
Hi Michael,
Thanks for the response. Ok, so we advertisers cannot block individual partners. Is there an option to opt out of all partners? IOW, is it possible to actually buy Yahoo! Search Marketing - only PPC ads on Yahoo! properties?
If not, I think such a feature would actually improve Yahoo! PPC revenue. I know I would bid higher for Yahoo! PPC ads. I suspect other advertisers would also bid higher. Combine that with not having to share revenue with partners and that’s more money for Yahoo!
The alternative is that advertisers will either drop Yahoo! PPC entirely or will bid lower to maintain a positive ROI. Not sure if the volume from “search” partners (mostly parked domains) at lower CPC would make up the difference. Certainly doesn’t seem to be a good long term strategy for Yahoo!
My apologies if a Yahoo!-only PPC ad configuration is an existing feature in the Panama upgrade that I simply haven’t found.
4. Melissa | March 1st, 2007 at 8:45 am
Richard, this isn’t an existing feature. I’ve heard lots of advertisers asking for it, though. Yahoo, you really should elevate the priority of this - it would make the program better for everybody.
5. WebProNews Video Blog &ra&hellip | March 30th, 2007 at 7:37 am
[…] to accept ad distribution to their partner network, which is rife with syndication fraud.” DiggOther Formats: MP4 | MP3Add this video to yoursite. […]
6. Vaxievka | June 26th, 2007 at 6:15 am
Thank you!
wertrtwer01 wertrtwer01
7. Kqluekkk | July 8th, 2007 at 11:08 pm
very interesting
breast augmentation southern california breast augmentation new jersey
8. bfamdbbgce | August 1st, 2007 at 1:09 am
Hello! Good Site! Thanks you! pudkvmlggxm
9. SAhUiuon | October 21st, 2007 at 6:10 pm
holiday
holiday
10. Australian Online Adverti&hellip | January 9th, 2008 at 12:33 am
[…] Improving Ad Quality, Part IV […]
11. Australian Online Adverti&hellip | January 9th, 2008 at 10:07 pm
[…] our senior director of content solutions, wrote a whole series about it (Part I, Part II, Part III, Part IV). Heck, we even elected a VP of Network Quality and opened a Network Quality […]
Leave a Comment
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed